ANNEX PUBLISHERS

Journal of Obesity and Overweight

ISSN: 2455-7633

Open Access
Research Article
Max Screen >>

Measure: Multiprofessional Intervention in Overweight and Obesity of Users Assisted in the Primary Health Care

Received Date: June 4, 2018 Accepted Date: December 18, 2018 Published Date: December 20, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Laessle R. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Related article at Pubmed, Google Scholar

Abstract

Obesity has been linked to autonomic dysfunction, which is thought to be one of the main contributors for hypertension, cardiac remodelling and death. The aim of the present study was to investigate stress related changes in autonomous function in subjects at high risk for obesity (Restrained eaters). 33 healthy women aged 18-30 years were recruited through advertisement in local newspapers. Classification in restrained and unrestrained eaters was done according to norm tables from the German version of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire. Participants were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test, a standardized laboratory stressor. As an indicator of autonomous function the measurement of heart rate was performed. Restrained eaters did not respond with a significant increase in heart rate after stress. The results are interpreted with respect to consequences for nutritional intake and stress coping.

Keywords: Stress; Heart rate; Obesity; Dietary restraint

Introduction

Obesity has been linked to autonomic dysfunction, which is thought to be one of the main contributors for hypertension, cardiac remodelling and death. Exercise and diet-based weight loss are the mainstay therapy for obesity, but there is a paucity of data regarding the effect of weight changes in autonomic nervous system activity.

Diet and exercise based weight loss appears to increase parasympathetic and decrease sympathetic activity, the opposing effects being observed with weight gain. These findings are not uniformly reported in the literature, possibly due to differences in study design, methodology, characteristics of the participants and techniques used to estimate autonomic nervous activity [1].

Visona & George [2] reported a significant higher postexercise energy intake in women with high dietary restraint, but did not link their results to alterations in sympathetic activity. Further data of the contribution of alterations in the autonomous nervous system for the control of energy balance are reviewed by Messina et al. [3], who came to the conclusion that a positive energy balance may be a consequence which in turn promotes overweight.

Under normal circumstances sympathetic activity is increased as a consequence of stress. Little is known of this phenomenon   in young women characterized by a high degree of dietary restraint, which makes them vulnerable to over eat, when cognitive control has been broken down and a dysregulation of intake may be a consequence. The present study therefore reports on stress induced changes in heart rate as an indicator of sympathetic activity.

Method

33 healthy women aged 18-30 years were recruited through advertisement in local newspapers. Exclusion criteria included oral contraceptive use, smoking, and regular alcohol consumption. To assess the presence of any of these exclusion criteria, participants were examined and interviewed by a physician. All women were paid for participation. Classification in restrained and unrestrained eaters for the present study was done according to norm tables from the German version of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire [4]. 12 had a low restraint score, 21 were high in dietary restraint. Participants were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test, a standardized laboratory stressor [5].

Measurement of heart rate was done by Einthoven-II-method with electrodes placed on thorax and forehead. The data were statistically analyzed by MANOVA for repeated measurement.

Results

The table shows the mean stress dependent heart rate for restrained and unrestrained eaters

The stressor lead to a significant increase in heart rate F (1,31) = 29,1, p< .001, but there was no different increase between restrained and unrestrained eaters F (1,31 = .63 p=.43.

Cortisol data for the sample are available from a former study [6], and show lower cortisol after stress for the restrained eaters.

Discussion

The present study found a significant post stress activation of autonomous function, indicated by heart rate, but no such reaction specifically in restrained eaters.

Our results are in line with the data of [7], who also found lower sympathetic activity after challenge in a sample of adolescents. Women after short term dieting also had reduced autonomous response [8]. In a former study [9] we measured intake characteristics after stress in obese subjects high in dietary restraint. No sympathetic activation was found but restraint was associated to a lack of deceleration of eating rate during a laboratory meal. A reduced autonomous activation after stress may be associated with  low coping resources that would be necessary to control intake after stress, and in turn promote obesity [10]. This interpretation is further supported by an investigation of Villada et al. [11] who found an adequate autonomous activation to be essential for constructive coping. The results of the study have to be interpreted under the constraint of several limitations. At the moment the sample size is small. Eating related hormones such as PYY or CCK could not be measured. Due to the necessity of standardization the study was done in the laboratory and therefore a transfer to the natural environment may be questioned.

Conclusion

Although the results have to be regarded as preliminary they suggest an altered autonomous function in restrained eaters associated with a dysregulation of short-term eating behavior that would promote obesity in the long-term.

4 Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde (PNAN) (3rd Edn) (2010) Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Brasil.
5 Alexandre A, Degasperi AS, Fernandes de Castro T, Avelar A, Nardo N (2016) Multidiciplinary programs for obesity treatment in Brazil: a systematic review. Rev Nutr Campinas 29: 867-84.
12 Pereira, da Silva IF, Spyrides, Constantino MH, Andrade, Barbosa LM (2016) Estado nutricional de idosos no Brasil: uma abordagem multinível. Cad Saúde Pública 32: e00178814.

Journal of Obesity and Overweight

Tables at a glance
table-icon
Table 1
table-icon
Table 2
table-icon
Table 3

Variables

n

%

Age

 

 

Adults

05

31,25

Older

11

68,75

Sex

 

 

Male

02

12,5

Female

14

87,5

Profession

 

 

Pensioner

08

50,0

Industry services

07

43,75

Home

01

6,25

Color/race

 

 

Black

07

43,75

Brown

08

50,0

Yellow

01

6,25

Education

 

 

Elementary education

10

62,5

Full elementary education

02

12,5

Full time

02

12,5

Incomplete secondary education

01

6,25

Post graduation course

01

 

Family income

 

 

Between 1 to 2 minimum salary

15

93,75

From 3 to 4 minimum salary

01

6,25

Source: research data (2017)

Table 1: Socioeconomic and demographic variables of the participants of the Measure Right Program. Diamantina-MG, Brazil, 2016-2017

Parameters

Pre-intervention

Pos-intervention

p-value

 

n

mean

n

mean

 

Weight (kg)

16

67,37

16

63,56

0,0015

BMI (kg/m2)

16

27,43

16

27,98

0,0043

CC (cm)

16

89,12

16

85,72

0,0026

CQ (cm)

16

0,87

16

0,81

0,0018

RWH (cm)

16

0,76

16

0,73

0,0035

Source: research data (2017). Legend: BMI: Body Mass Index, CC: circumference of waist, CQ: circumference of hip and RWH: relation waist/hip

Table 2: Effect anthropometric parameters of the Measure Right program Diamantina/ MG, Brazil, 2016-2017

Food Groups

Pre intervention

post intervention

p-value

Food and beverage

45,2

62,7

0,002

Meat and eggs

66,5

65,8

0,0056

Milk and milk products

52,8

47,3

0,0647

Pasta and tubers

78,2

82,7

0,0752

Desserts

23,9

15,9

0,0880

Fruit

58,2

72,1

0,001

Industrialized

63,7

75,2

0,0752

Oils and fats

25,1

20,9

0,001

Beverages

33,1

31,8

0,0528

Cereals and grains

69,5

72,9

0,0679

Source: research data (2017).

Table 3: Frequency of daily consumption of food groups, adults and the elderly. Diamantina/MG, 2016-17

Questions

Before (%)

After (%)

What is healthy eating for you? Answer: natural, rich in FVG

77,7

100

Do you think your food is healthy?

Yes: 55 No 44

Yes: 77,7 No: 22,2

Name 2 healthy food eat every day

Rice and beans: 38,8 Meat and FLG: 27,7

Rice and beans: 33,3 Meat and FLG: 66,6

What is unhealthy eating for you?

Excessive mass: 33,3
Fat, salt, sugar and industrialized: 66,6 overeating: 11,1

Fat, salt, sugar and industrialized: 66,6

Name 2 unhealthy foods that you eat every day?

Carbohydrates: 11
Sausages: 16.6 Salt, sugar and fat: 28

Not as: 38.8% Industrialized: 11.1
Salt, sugar and fats: 50

What is excess weight for you?

Weight above normal: 39 Do not diet and AF: 16.6 Harmful to health: 16.6

Weight above normal: 55.5 Harmful to health: 44.4

What causes you to be overweight?

Do not diet and AF: 77.7 Anxiety: 5.55

Do not diet and AF: 77.7 Anxiety: 5.55

What could be done to lose weight?

Diet and FT: 94.4

Diet and FT: 94.4

What is harder for you in order to lose weight?

Do not do FT and Diet: 72.2

Do not do FT and Diet: 72.2

Source: research data (2017). Legend: FLG: fruits, vegetables and greens, FT: physical training

Table 4: Knowledge about diet and nutrition of the participants of the Measure Right program (n = 16), Diamantina / MG, Brazil, 2016-2017