ANNEX PUBLISHERS

Journal of Forensic Science & Criminology

ISSN: 2348-9804

Open Access
Research Article
Max Screen >>

Y-STR: A Full Proof Technique for Male DNA Genotyping in Forensics

Received Date: August 11, 2020 Accepted Date: December 19, 2020 Published Date: December 22, 2020

Copyright: © 2021 Ariff S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Related article at Pubmed, Google Scholar

Abstract

Crime statistics estimate that males are responsible for 80% of violent crimes and those males commit approximately 95% of sexual offenses. Sexual assault crimes account for a large percentage of biological evidence submitted to forensic casework laboratories. Identifying, segregating, and analyzing male DNA in sexual assault and other evidence containing mixtures of male and female DNA presents a complex challenge. Crime laboratories have traditionally employed a differential extraction method to separate spermatozoa from non-sperm cells. This technique is used to fractionate male and female DNA for analysis with autosomal typing methods. Due to the typically high quantities of female DNA encountered in sexual assault evidence, the ability to detect the minor male component may be limited. Detecting low levels of male DNA in a high background of female DNA samples, as is typically encountered in sexual assault cases is difficult. Y-STR chemistry is a powerful tool for the analysis of sexual assault cases that contain a suspect(s). The Y-Filer technique is the powerful tool & can be used to include or exclude a suspect(s) associated with an investigation.

Keywords:Forensics; Rape Assault; Y-STR; Genotyping

Introduction

The cause of this difficulty is that differential lysis of the male and female cellular fractions does not always result in complete separation of the fractions, resulting in difficulties in interpretation. Differential lysis is a laborious and time-consuming method of separation possibly when the male contributor has undergone a vasectomy or produces azoospermic semen. It is difficult to analyze body fluids from more than one individual. In such cases, preferential amplification of the major component of the mixture (usually female DNA) can mask the genetic profile of the male component [1]. It is because the autosomal STRs allow the detection of minor components only if they account for more than 5% of the mixture [2,3]. Sex-typing based on amelogenin is an integral part of most identifier PCR multiplex kits. Gender determination plays an important role in forensic casework and creating DNA database [4]. The unique biology of the Y chromosome has led to the extensive use in forensic studies in determining identity of male individuals and patrilineal relationships [5-11]. Y-STR haplotyping is a method used to detect and differentiate male DNA. The methodology was developed in parallel with the autosomal STR analysis for human identification purposes and evaluated in a very similar way for forensic analysis. Shortly after the characterization and evaluation of the first Y-chromosomal STR polymorphism its usefulness in crime casework was demonstrated when a mixed stain from a vaginal swab of a raped and murdered female victim was resolved by Y-STR analysis and a falsely convicted male was excluded [12,13]. Unambiguous detection of the male component in DNA mixtures with a high female background is still the main field of application of forensic Y-STR haplotyping. Y-STRs in combination with autosomal STRs will thus be employed preferentially in sexual assault cases [14]. Y-STR haplotyping method has been validated and standardized between labs and is now widely used in forensic applications [15-17].

A sexual assault case reported where a lady was brutally raped by four suspects in slum area. The accused were absconding from the scene of crime. According to FIR (first information report) “The lady (victim) was working as a maid and went to meet her friend in slum area. Victim’s friend requests her to wait for an hour that she will return by work. at her home. During the period the suspects entered into the home and close the door. The victim cannot understand the situation and she became afraid by the persons. The suspects threatened to kill her and said to cooperate them. The four suspects raped her forcefully one by one and abscond from scene of crime. When her friend returned, they registered a FIR against unknown persons. After a month police team was caught and arrested the suspects.

It is very difficult to do the selection of semen stain of different accused from bed sheet. By different stain selection we segregate the stains from different location. DNA analysis which helped to connect the real accused in this case.

Vaginal swab of victim, control blood sample of accused, exhibit like bed sheet, condom collected from the scene of crime.

Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
Detection of Blood and Semen on Crime Scene Exhibits

No blood detected on vaginal swab of victim and bed sheet; condom collected from scene was confirmed by Kastle-Meyer Test.

Semen was detected on vaginal swab of victim, bed sheet, condom collected from scene was confirmed by Acid-Phosphatase Test.

Extraction of DNA From Swab and Stains by Ez1 Auto Sampler Method

I. Carefully cleaned the platform of workstation of laminar flow with ethyl alcohol. II. Approx 0.5mm sample piece and cut respective sample into small pieces and taken into 2ml micro-centrifuge sample tube. III. Added 400μl Forensic Buffer +25 μl Proteinase K+40 μl 1mM DTT IV. Vertex and spine. V. Incubated at 56 oC overnight with Thermo-Shaker. VI. To the next day, transferred the sample into the EZ1 micro-centrifuge sample tube. VII. Set the micro-centrifuge sample tube in the EZ1 Advanced magnetic bead based liquid handling system for automate DNA Isolation. VIII. Store the extracted DNA at -20 oC

Extraction of DNA from Blood by Micro Kit Method

I. 5 μl blood + 97.5 μl ATL buffer+100μl AL buffer+10 μl Proteinase K taken in to micro-centrifuge Tube II. Vortex and spin for 1 min. III. Incubated at 56 oC for 10 min’s on Thermo-shaker. IV. Added 50 μl 99% ethanol then vortex and spin. V. Wait for 5 min’s and transferred the supernatant into the micro-kit column. VI. Centrifuge at 80000rpm for 1 min’s and discarded the filtrate. VII. Washed the column by adding 500 μl washing solution. VIII. Centrifuge the column at 8000rpm for 2min’s and discarded the filtrate. IX. Repeated the procedure X. Spin the empty column at 10000rpm for 3min. XI. Transferred the column in new Elution Tube XII. Finally added 100 μl Elution Buffer to the column, centrifuge at 14000rpm for 2 min’s XIII. Removed the column and store the DNA for at -20 oC

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Reagents Volume: STR genotyping was carried out using the AmpFISTR Y-filer PCR Amplification kit. I. AmpFlSTR® Yfiler® PCR reaction mix: 10.5μl II. AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase: 0.5μl III. AmpFlSTR® Yfiler® Primer set: 5.5μl IV. DNA Sample: 10μl

PCR Protocol:

Fragment Analysis: STR fragment analysis is done and analyzed on 3130 Genetic Analyzer instrument by capillary electrophoresis of single stranded amplified DNA fragments includes following steps.

Sample Preparation for Injection

Standard Mix: Single or pooled PCR Product: 1μL Size standard: 0.5 μL Hi-Di™ formamide: 10-20 μL

Protocol:

I. Denatured of PCR product (90-95 oC, 2-5 min) II. Immediately on ice or cool to 4 oC in thermal cycler III. Loaded the mixture in auto sampler on instrument for injection. IV. Electrophoresis is done through fine glass capillary filled with polymeric gel. V. DNA fragments traveled through capillary according to their size & reach the window which coincides with the Laser device in the instrument. VI. Laser excites the fluorescently labeled DNA fragments. VII. CCD Camera behind the window recorded the excitation peaks. VIII. Excitation peaks for 16 different loci are obtained. IX. Run standard allelic ladder for each set of samples. X. DATA Collected by software.

Results

It was very tricky job to extract the DNA from the samples collected by medical officer and scene of crime. There are always chances of cross contamination and mixing of foreign DNA. But we used specific reagents, chemicals and instrument to get the accurate results.

The table mentioned below shows that male DNA isolated from selected different stains on bed sheet, condom and vaginal swab matches with the DNA isolated from blood samples of four prime suspects in the crime. DNA was fragmented and run on the Genetic Analyser by using electrophoresis technique. The universal 17Y STR markers used in this method are listed in the table in first column. The unknown Electropherogram of male DNA derived from semen stains on bed sheet, condom and vaginal swab shown in column 2-7. Electropherogram of male DNA derived from control blood samples of suspects shown in column 8-11 was found matched. Table 1 STR typing are summarized below

DNA profile of male haplotype obtained from vaginal swab of victim and bed sheet, condom collected from scene of crime and male haplotype obtained from control blood sample of all accused are found matched and from the same paternal progeny.

Discussion

The application of DNA profiling in the criminal investigations is an important aspect of criminal justice system today. In the present case, the first spark of doubt about the authenticity of the case flashed with the presence of accused DNA profile in any of the victim’s exhibits. Moreover, the DNA profile generated from the vaginal swab, of deceased and blood stain, semen stain detected on full jean pant of accused was similar to the DNA profile generated from the blood sample of the alleged accused, which proved that the involvement of accused. Accused got punished for his ‘violent behaviour’. In the present case, DNA fingerprinting technology was successfully applied in solving the criminal case in our laboratory. The above illustrative case proved that DNA profiling is a tool that is used to apprehend the guilty. As it often helpful in the justice delivery system, conventional evidence.

9Kayser M, Caglia A, Corach D, Fretwell N, Gehrig C, et al. (1997) Evaluation of Y-chromosomal STRs: A multicenter study. Int J Legal Med 110: 125-9.
16Kayser M, Caglia´ A, Corach D, Fretwell N, Gehrig C, et al. (1997)Evaluation of Y-chromosomal STRs: a multicentre study. Int J Legal Med 110: 125-33.

Journal of Forensic Science & Criminology

Tables at a glance
table-icon
Table 1

Reagents

Parameters

Forensic Buffer

: 1 ml Tris HCL-100ml,0.5ml EDTA Buffer -10ml 5M Nacl-10ml, Make the volume up to 1000ml

Proteinase K

: Appearance- Colourless solution in 50% glycerol, 20mM Tris.,1mM Cacl2, PH ca.7.4, Concentration 20mg solid/ml

Investigator kit

: Buffer G2, Prot.K, Carrier RNA

AmpFlSTR® Yfiler® PCR Amplification Kit

: Allelic Ladder, Ampli Taq Gold® DNA polymerase, Primers

 

Primers

: BDYS456, BDYS389I, BDYS390, BDYS389II, GDYS458, GDYS19, GDYS385, YDYS393, YDYS391, YDYS439, YDYS635, YDYS392, RYGATAH4, RDYS437

Hi-DiTMFormamide

: CAS 75-12-7, CAS 60-00-4

Size Standard

GeneScanTM-500, LIZTM

 

 

Parameter

Denaturation

Polymerase Activation

Annealing

Extension PCR (30) Cycles

Hold

Hold

Hold

Hold

Temperature

95 oC

94 oC

61 oC

72 oC

60 oC

4 oC

Time

11:00 min

1:00 min

1:00 min

1:00 min

80:00 min

 

 

 

STR LOCUS

GENOTYPE

Exhibits collected from scene of crime

M.O.
Sample

Exhibits collected by Investigation

Bed Sheet

 

Condom

V. Swab from Victim

Control Blood samples of Accused

Stain 1

Stain 2

Stain 3

Stain 4

A1

A2

A3

A4

BDYS456

15

15

14

15

15

15

15

15

14

15

BDYS389I

13

12

13

13

14

12

13

12

13

13

BDYS390

24

22

24

23

25

22

24

22

24

23

BDYS389II

30

29

30

29

33

29

30

29

30

29

GDYS458

15

15

15

17

17

15

15

15

15

17

GDYS19

16

15

14

16

15

15

16

15

14

16

GDYS385

11,14

14,16

8,15

15,17

11,15

14,16

11,14

14,16

8,15

15,17

 

 

 

STR LOCUS

GENOTYPE

Exhibits collected from scene of crime

M.O.
Sample

Exhibits collected by Investigation

Bed Sheet

 

Condom

V. Swab from Victim

Control Blood samples of Accused

Stain 1

Stain 2

Stain 3

Stain 4

A1

A2

A3

A4

YDYS393

13

11

13

12

13

11

13

11

13

12

YDYS391

11

10

10

10

11

10

11

10

10

10

YDYS439

10

12

11

11

10

12

10

12

11

11

YDYS635

23

22

20

21

23

22

23

22

20

21

YDYS392

11

14

11

11

11

14

11

14

11

11

RYGATAH4

12

12

11

11

12

12

12

12

11

11

RDYS437

14

15

14

14

14

15

14

15

14

14

RDYS438

11

10

10

9

11

10

11

10

10

9

RDYS448

20

15

18

19

20

20

20

20

18

19

*A: Accused; V.swab: Vaginal swab; STR: Short Tandem Repeats; M.O.: Medical Officer
Table 1: Represented the Y-STR profile of the exhibits collected (A) DNA profile of male haplotype obtained from vaginal swab of victim matched with the DNA profile of male haplotype obtained from control blood sample of one of the accused;
(B) DNA profile of male haplotype obtained from condom collected from scene of crime matched with the DNA profile of male haplotype obtained from control blood sample of one of the accused; (C) DNA profile of male haplotype obtained from different semen stain detected on bed sheet collected from scene of crime matched with the DNA profile of male haplotype obtained from control blood sample of all of the accused