ANNEX PUBLISHERS

Journal of Cancer Science and Clinical Oncology

ISSN: 2394-6520

Open Access
Research Article
Max Screen >>

Successful use of Eltrombopag for Management of Temozolomide Related Severe Prolonged Thrombocytopenia and Aplastic Anaemia in The Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) in a Regional Centre: A Case Report and Literature Review

Received Date: June 22, 2020 Accepted Date: December 02, 2020 Published Date: December 04, 2020

Copyright: © 2021 Ariff S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Related article at Pubmed, Google Scholar

Abstract

Temozolomide is an orally administered chemotherapeutic drug used concurrently with radiation for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Although the addition of Temozolomide has shown to improve overall survival, it is commonly associated with haematological complications. Eltrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist that is also used off-label for temozolomide-induced aplastic anaemia.

We report a case of severe prolonged thrombocytopenia in a patient with Glioblastoma Multiforme on Temozolomide. She had a significant drop in platelets from 275 to 53 with pancytopenia. Her thrombocytopenia persisted with platelet nadir of 4 × 109/L for several weeks even after stopping Temozolomide. Haemolytic screening and autoimmune screening were negative. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) and prednisone along with Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matched platelets were used for support during this period. She required a prolonged hospital stay involving extended packed red cell and platelet transfusion support. There was a slight improvement in white cell and neutrophil counts, eight weeks post-cessation of Temozolomide. Bone marrow aspiration showed markedly hypocellular bone marrow aspirate suggestive of aplastic anaemia or hypoplastic Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). Eltrombopag 50mg daily was commenced, which was tolerated well. There was a significant improvement in the thrombocytopenia within a week of initiating eltrombopag. Platelet transfusions and regular GCSF were stopped as all the parameters continued to show improvement. The platelet transfusion requirement decreased to weekly within a week of starting eltrombopag.

Eltrombopag facilitated a rapid and sustained recovery of platelet count. Our literature review suggests some evidence for the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with chemotherapy-related refractory thrombocytopenia. But high-quality safety and efficacy data is limited while waiting for the results of randomised control trials.

Keywords: Oncology; Haematology; Chemotherapy; Thrombocytopenia

List of abbreviations: AE: Adverse Events; ANA: Anti-Nuclear Antibody; ATRX: Alph Thalassemia/Mental Retardation Syndrome X-Linked; CCRT: Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Group; Cf: Compared To; CIT: Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia; COJEC: Cisplatin, Vincristine, Carboplatin, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide; CTCAE: Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events; CVAD: Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), Dexamethasone; EGFR: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor; GCSF: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; HLA: Human Leukocyte Antigen; IDH1: Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Gene; ICE: Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide; ITP: Idiopathic Thrombocypenic Purpura; IV Ig: Intravenous Immunoglobulin; MDS: Myelodysplastic Syndrome; NSCLC: Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma; PBS: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme; PEG-Rhmgdf: Pegylated Recombinant Human Megakaryocyte Growth and Development Factor; Rhtpo: Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin; Rx: Therapy/Treatment; TERT: Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase; TPO: Thrombopoietin; WCC: White Cell Count.

Case

We are reporting the case of a 63-year-old female who developed significant haematological toxicity related to Temozolomide, used as a part of the Stupp protocol for the treatment of Glioblastoma multiforme.

Her initial presentation was in February 2018 with generalised tonic-clonic seizure and expressive dysphasia. MRI-B revealed subacute left parietal infarction; however, glioma could not be entirely excluded. She subsequently re-presented with confusion and seizures in July 2018, and an intracranial lesion was confirmed on repeat MRI brain. She underwent stereotactic left parietal craniotomy and microsurgical excision of the tumour in October 2018. Histopathology confirmed IDH1 wild type diffuse astrocytic glioma, with retained ATRX and had high-level EGFR amplification (IDH1- Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene, ATRX- Alph thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked, EGFR- Epidermal growth factor receptor). There was a TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase) promoter mutation, trisomy 7 and monosomy 10. Based on the immuno-profile, the tumour was managed as glioblastoma as recommended by the multidisciplinary team. Her postoperative recovery was uneventful, and she remained asymptomatic. She did not have any other significant past medical history. She was a life-long non-smoker and rarely drank alcohol. Medications before commencing chemoradiotherapy included levetiracetam, targin, atorvastatin, esomeprazole, and citalopram. Levetiracetam was changed to sodium valproate a few weeks before presentation due to intolerance. Baseline blood tests were within normal limits.

The adjuvant chemoradiotherapy as per the Stupp protocol started on 07 January 2019. Temozolomide was given at a dose of 75 mg/m2 daily as standard practice. Initial complications included grade 1 diarrhoea in the first month, which improved with antidiarrheal medication. On 4th February 2019, week 5 of treatment, a significant drop in platelets from 275 to 53 was noted with stable WCC(white cell count) and neutrophil count. Temozolomide was stopped, but pancytopenia continued to worsen with platelets reaching 13 on 07 February. Due to her remote location more than 3 hours away from the closest regional hospital, she was admitted and platelet transfusions were initiated. During admission the thrombocytopenia continued, refractory to regular platelet transfusions. Haemolytic screening and autoimmune screening were negative other than a borderline ANA (Anti-nuclear Antibody) titre of 1:80 with speckled pattern.

She developed easy bruising, dizziness and non-specific visual symptoms but did not have any bleeding. Her fundoscopy was unremarkable, and repeat brain imaging remained unchanged. By 15 February 2019, she also developed neutropenia, and platelet count further decreased to 4, which prompted daily platelet transfusions. GCSF and prednisone 1mg/kg daily were also introduced. We decided to use HLA matched platelets as recommended by the haematology team as HLA antibody was detected suspected due to poor improvement in platelet counts post-transfusion. The pancytopenia continued to remain refractory more than two weeks after stopping Temozolomide, despite the use of HLA matched platelet transfusion, GCSF and blood transfusions. The increment of platelet count post-transfusion was higher after the use of HLA-matched platelets but was still variable. Due to prolonged severe pancytopenia, she was transferred to a tertiary centre as full-time haematology cover was not available locally. She received almost daily platelet transfusions with only minimal and transient improvement in cell counts between 07 March and 21 May.

Sodium valproate was switched to lamotrigine as it can potentially increase serum temozolomide level, which could have contributed to prolonged thrombocytopenia. There was a slight improvement in white cell and neutrophil counts, eight weeks post-cessation of Temozolomide (Figure 1 and 2). Bone marrow aspiration showed markedly hypocellular bone marrow aspirate suggestive of aplastic anaemia or hypoplastic MDS supporting Temozolomide as the cause of the pancytopenia. Eltrombopag 50mg daily was commenced on 21 May 2019 as recommended by the haematology team based on literature review. Eltrombopag was tolerated well with mild fatigue as the only new symptom. There was a significant improvement in the thrombocytopenia within a week of initiating eltrombopag. The frequency of platelet transfusions dropped which made discharge planning possible. By 12 June, platelet transfusions and regular GCSF were stopped as all the cytopenias continued to show improvement. By 18th July pancytopenia had markedly improved, and both GCSF and Eltrombopag were stopped. Figure 1, Figure 2 and Table 2 show the progression of the WCC, neutrophils, platelets and Hb over time. Although the initial platelet count remained in the low normal range, most cytopenias normalised by September 2019. She continues on close observation, and the last MRI brain from January 2020 remains stable

Although there was a clear faster and sustained recovery within a week of commencing eltrombopag, it is difficult to completely exclude the possibility of the inherent marrow recovery coinciding with the start date. The gradual improvement in the platelet count checked post platelet transfusion can be attributed to the use of HLA matched platelets. The better platelet count response post-transfusion is also likely to be related to the streamlining of the process of harvesting from the identified donors allowing the use of fresher platelets which showed better platelet increments. The platelet transfusion requirement decreased to weekly within a week of starting eltrombopag, the threshold for transfusion being a down-trending platelet count of less than 50. Improvement in pancytopenia was also noted after Eltrmobopag was introduced. Of note, the platelet transfusion threshold decision included consideration of logistical factors like the patient’s remote location. Although the application to commence eltrombopag was made earlier in the course of treatment, there was a significant delay in accessing the medication. The main delay was likely due to eltrombopag not being reimbursed under Medicare Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in Australia for this indication.

Discussion

Temozolomide is an orally administered second-generation alkylating chemotherapeutic drug that methylates DNA and prevents tumour cell proliferation [1]. Concurrent therapy with radiation followed by monthly Temozolomide is the standard of care in adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Addition of Temozolomide improved overall 2-year survival from 10.9% to 27.2% as compared to radiotherapy alone. In Stupp protocol, Temozolomide is given at a dose of 75mg/m2 from day 1 to 42 with radiation. After completion of chemoradiotherapy, it is prescribed at a dose of 150 mg/m2 followed by 200mg/m2 depending on tolerance from day 1 to 5, every 28 days [1].

Temozolomide is commonly associated with haematological complications; 55% grade 3 or 4 lymphopenia, 4-19% thrombocytopenia, 8-14% neutropenia and 11% leukopenia [2]. Stupp et al. reported grade 3-4 leukopenia of 7% (2% in concurrent chemoradiotherapy group-CCRT, 5% in the adjuvant group). The rate of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was 3% in CCRT group compared to 11% in the adjuvant group with 8% overall discontinuation rate due to toxicities [2]. Other studies have also reported up to 39% overall haematological side effects [2]. In the adjuvant setting, treatment couldn’t be completed in 54% of cases, with a 20% discontinuation rate in concomitant chemoradiotherapy group. Neutropenia (8%) was more common during the CCRT phase compared to the adjuvant phase (3%) [2]. Leukopenia (47.7%), and neutropenia (34.1%) were the most common adverse events as reported in another publication by Kesari et al. [3].

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is usually immune-mediated. The transfused platelets are also vulnerable to this immune-mediated destruction, which can decrease their lifespan. Platelets express ABO antigens on their surface, as well as HLA class I antigens [4-18]. Studies have demonstrated that the administration of HLA-matched platelets improved both platelet recovery and survival. Furthermore, the degree of match can predict the success of post-transfusion platelet count increments. Platelets survive on an average of 10 days but can vary widely from 15 to 211 hours [19-23]. Hence, there is a need for frequent platelet transfusions, and the incremental response and the duration of survival of platelets can be variable requiring regular monitoring.

Since the discovery of thrombopoietin in 1994, recombinant thrombopoietin molecules like Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), and pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rhMGDF) were developed. Further development was stopped due to concerns over neutralising antibody formation. However, the thrombopoietin receptor agonists were noted to have less risk of antibody formation.

Eltrombopag is oral non-peptide thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist that has been shown to increase the platelet count in both healthy individuals and thrombocytopenic patients with ITP, hepatitis C, or aplastic anaemia. Eltrombopag has also been used along with GCSF for temozolomide-induced aplastic anaemia with a haematological response [4].

There are also reports of the use of other thrombopoietin receptor agonists like romiplostim. There may have been concerns regarding tumour growth stimulation with the use of thrombopoietin agonists. But it is considered safe from this perspective, as studies have shown solid tumours do not possess functional thrombopoietin receptors [21-28]. Hence, these agents have been used in patients with chemotherapy-related refractory thrombocytopenia which, as a result, allowed the safe continuation of chemotherapy [5].

We conducted a literature search for all the reports and studies reporting the use of thrombopoietin agonists in the setting of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia till 20 July 2020 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Pubmed. The reported cases and studies are summarised in Table 1 and 2.

The PLATUM trial used Romiplostim in patients who developed grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia related to Temozolomide during the chemoradiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma [15]. Out of 20 patients enrolled, 12 (60%) were able to complete the six cycles of maintenance Temozolomide and four patients discontinued due to progression or unrelated adverse events. 2 (10%) patients did not respond to Romiplostim. Dardis et al. reviewed 28 patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia while receiving treatment for glial tumours (glioblastoma, astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma). Either eltrombopag or romiplostim was started at the discretion of the treating physician but typically when platelets count had fallen below 100 X 10 9/L. 95% of patients were able to recommence chemotherapy and continue treatment. The patient who did not respond had previously received chemotherapy for leukaemia during childhood. There was one sudden unexpected death suspected to be pulmonary embolism, although no autopsy was performed [6].

Al-Samkari et al. recently published a study which retrospectively evaluated 170 patients with CIT who were treated with Romiplostim [17]. 150 patients had solid tumours, predominantly gastrointestinal malignancies. 71% of patients achieved a Romiplostim response which was defined as the achievement of platelet count ≥ 75 X 109/L and ≥30 x 109/L above baseline. Furthermore, 79% avoided dose reductions or delays and 89% avoided platelet transfusions. 10% response rate was seen in patients with non-myeloid haematological malignancy with bone marrow involvement. Seven patients developed venous thromboembolism (VTE) without associated thrombocytosis, and no arterial thromboembolic events occurred.

In 2016, Iuliano published results from a study of 22 patients, at high risk of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) who received low dose eltrombopag as prophylaxis. CIT was prevented in 21 out of 22 patients in this study [7]. Soff et al. also reported a phase II, open-label trial of romiplostim in solid tumour patients with at least four weeks of thrombocytopenia (100 X 109/L), despite reduction or delay in chemotherapy [8a,8b]. Romiplostim effectively reversed CIT, allowing for resumption and maintenance of cancer-directed therapy in the majority of patients [8]. Natale et al. [13] and Frey et al. [16] reported two separate randomised placebo-controlled phase II trials testing Romiplostim in treatment of CIT in NSCLC and Eltrombopag in the prophylactic use in patients being treated for AML respectively. Both studies did not demonstrate beneficial impact on platelet count related efficacy endpoints. A Cochrane systemic review looked at the current evidence for the use of TPO agonist in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia and found limited quality evidence [16].

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists can be associated with venous thrombosis and the induction of marrow fibrosis [24]. Also, there have been concerns that due to the promotion of hematopoietic stem cells, it might also promote growth or survival of malignant cells. These have limited the widespread adoption of the thrombopoietin agonists in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Although Eltrombopag is more convenient due to its oral form, there is no study comparing it with Romiplostim. However, from our review, the trials studying romiplostim reported less thrombotic events and hepatotoxicity. There are multiple randomised phase 3 clinical trials currently in recruiting phase investigating the use of Romiplostim in the setting of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in NSCLC, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, (NCT03937154) and gastrointestinal cancer (NCT03362177) expected to complete by the end of 2022 or early 2023.

Conclusion

While there have been multiple retrospective and smaller randomised studies looking at the use of thrombopoietin agonists in CIT, the role and indications for their use remains unclear. Thrombocytopenia is one of the commonest dose-limiting side effects with cytotoxic chemotherapy, including Temozolomide. This case report highlights one of the potential specific indications where thrombopoietin agonist can be of great help as rescue therapy in marked prolonged CIT. But the associated risk of the side effects, including hepatotoxicity and thromboembolic complications, should also be taken into account. Although multiple publications support the use of TPO agonists, the consideration of publication bias is also essential. Hence, more quality evidence is required to be able to estimate the benefits compared to the potential toxicities. However, as more clinical trials are underway, we should have more evidence in this area to guide our clinical practice in the near future.

Learning Points

• Temozolomide can cause marked prolonged haematological toxicity which can be very challenging to manage. • Eltrombopag provided a fast and sustained recovery from chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia • There was a delay in receiving eltrombopag as it is not listed on the PBS for this indication despite shared pay program from the drug company. • Literature review suggests some evidence for the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with CIT but high-quality safety and efficacy data still lacking.

8Soff GA, Miao Y, Bendheim G, Batista J, Mones JV, et al. (2019)Romiplostim Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia. J Clin Oncol 37: 2892-8.
12Winer ES, Safran H, Karaszewska B, Richards DA, Hartner L, et al. Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag (epag) versus placebo (pbo) for the treatment (tx) of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in patients with solid tumors receiving gemcitabine (gem)-based chemotherapy (ctx): A phase I study. J Clin Oncol 30: 9117.
13Parameswaran R, Lunning M, Mantha S, Devlin S, Hamilton A, et al. (2014)Romiplostim for management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. Supportive Care in Cancer 22: 1217-22.

Journal of Cancer Science and Clinical Oncology

Tables at a glance
table-icon
Table 1
table-icon
Table 2
Figures at a glance
image-icon
Figure 1
image-icon
Figure 2

Figure 1: Platelets (10*9/L), WCC (10*9/L) and Hb (g/L) levels from 04 January 2019 to 15 May 2020

Figure 2: WCC (10*9/L) and neutrophil (10*9/L) levels from 04 January 2019 to 15 May 2020

Author/year pub- lished/ Drug

Type of study

Patient (N)

Indication for use

Chemotherapy

Result

 

Al-Samkari et al. [17] 2020
Romiplostim

 

Retrospec- tive review

 

173 (153 solid tumour- most common GI)

 

Treatment of persistent CIT (>3 weeks since last chemotherapy)

 

Multiple (most common Platinum, Gemcitabine, Temozolomide, Taxane)

Clinical benefit in 71% of solid tumor patients with achieving platelet count ≥ 75 X 109/L and at least 30X 109/L higher than baseline
98% were able to receive ad- ditional chemotherapy (median 4 cycles)

Le Rhun etal. [15] 2019 Romiplostim

Phase II single-arm trial

 

20 patients with Glioblastoma

Treatment of CIT after CCRT (Grade 3/4)

 

Temozolomide

12/20 (60%) patients were able to continue treatment (6 cycles) without interruption

Fassel H etal. [5] 2019
Romiplostim

 

Case report in paediat- ric oncology

 

2 patients with Neuroblas- toma

 

IV Ig and transfusion refractory CIT

Antineuroblas- toma chemo- therapy (N7 induction, rapid COJEC, ICE)

 

Allowed safe and timely continu- ation of chemotherapy without relapse of thrombocytopenia

 

Frey et al. [16] 2019 Eltrombopag

 

Ran- domised, double blind, Phase II

 

148 patients with AML

 

Prophylactic use (Day 4 of in- duction, dose escalation if Day 7 platelet count <100x109/L)

 

Anthracycline- based

Eltrombopag did not improve the time to platelet recovery or incidences of grade 3-4 thrombo- cytopenia
No significant difference in throm- boembolic adverse events with eltrombopag

 

Soff GA et al. [8] 2019
Romiplostim

 

Ran- domised phase 2 trial compared to observa- tion

 

23 patients with Solid tumours

 

Treatment of CIT for at least 4 weeks, despite dose reduction and delay

 

Multiple regi- mens

14 out of 15 (93%) patients randomised to Romiplostim, achieved platelet count correction (≥ 100x10 9/L) within 3 weeks,
- converted to single arm- 44 of the total 52 (84%) patients also responded.
10.2% developed VTE.

Al-Samkari etal.
[18] 2018 Romi- plostim

 

Retrospec- tive analysis

 

22 with CIT or pre-existing thrombocytop-nia

Prophylactic and treatment if Platelet count nadir <100 x10 9/L with or without chemoRx

Multiple (most common
FOLFOX)

18/22 (81%) were able to continue treatment without interruption or dose reduction.
No thrombotic events

 

Iuliano etal. 2018 [25] and 2016 [7]

 

Case series

 

28 patients, 22 with solid tumours, 6 with DLBC

 

Prophylaxis when platelet count
<80 x10 9/L

 

Platinum-based

1/28 patient required increased dose of Eltrombopag, all other pa- tients achieved endpoints of avoid- ing Platelet Nadir<50 X 109/L, transfusions, bleeding events, dose reduction or delays.

Newton etal. [4] 2018
Eltrombopag

 

Case report

 

Patient with GBM

 

Treatment of prolonged aplastic anaemia (Platelet Nadir-6)

 

Temozolomide

Benefit noted- hematopoietic recovery at day 131 following first dose of temozolomide
AE- stopped Temozolomide due to transaminitis.

 

Dardis, C et al. [6] 2017
Eltrombopag Romiplostim

 

Retrospec- tive Case Series

 

28 patients with Glioma, who developed CIT

 

Treatment for CIT (Platelets <100 x10 9/L or physician discretion)

 

Temozolomide, bevacizumab, lomustine

27/ 28 (96%) patients responded, all patients were able to resume chemotherapy and continue for longer time at higher doses than prior to the treatment (median 32 months).
AE- 1 patient had intractable itch- ing, and 1 death (suspected PE)

Author/year pub- lished/ Drug

Type of study

Patient (N)

Indication for use

Chemotherapy

Result

 

 

Winer ES et al. [14] 2017
Eltrombopag

 

Ran- domised placebo controlled Phase 2

 

 

75 (52 received Rx)

 

Treatment for CIT
(pre-treatment platelet count
<100 x10 9/L on chemotherapy) Prophylaxis if <150 x10 9/L

 

 

Gemcitabine with or without combination with platinum

shortened the time to platelet count recovery and reduced dose delays/reductions
Lower rate of (77% vs 100%) grade 3 or more thrombocytopenia Thrombosis ( 5/52 cf. 2/23 in placebo)
Hepatotoxicity (13/52 cf. 4/23 in placebo)
Total Serious AEs (16/52 cf. 12/23 in placebo)

 

Miao, J etal. [ 9] 2016
Romiplostim

 

Retrospec- tive Case series

 

32 patients, with CIT (59% GI malignancy)

 

Treatment for CIT (Mean 68 x10 9/L )

 

 

Platinum-based

28 out of 32 (87%) patients re- sponded, and were able to receive 2 or more cycles of chemotherapy without delays or dose reductions for thrombocytopenia, median duration 131.5 days
4 patients developed Venous thromboembolism

 

 

Urena LE et al. [28] Romiplostim

 

 

Case series

 

 

15 patients with malignancies (11 non-hematologic)

 

Treatment for CIT median baseline platelet count-
69 x 109 L (8-90)

 

 

Multiple regi- mens

87% of patients achieved response, in 11 cases with platelet counts of
> 100 x 109L. This allowed full- dose of chemotherapy.
2 patients who did not responde were on 9th line of Rx for breast cancer and 4th line for small cell cancer.
no treatment-related toxicities observed.

 

Winer ES et al. [10] 2015
Eltrombopag

 

Ran- domised placebo controlled phase 1 study

 

26 patients planned for gemcitabine monotherapy or combination

 

Prophylaxis if platelet count
≤300 × 109/L

 

Gemcitabine and platinum- based

14% in Eltrombopag cf. 50% in placebo arm required chemothera- py dose reductions and/or delays Dose not escalated to >100mg/day due to thrombocytosis but no dose limiting toxicity
2 cases of VTE in Eltrombopag arm were considered to be unre- lated

 

Parameswaran, R. et al. [12] 2014
Romiplostim

 

Retrospec- tive review

 

20 with predominantly solid tumours

 

Treatment of protracted CIT (<100× 109/L for at least 6 weeks despite dose delay or reduction)

 

Multiple regi- mens

clinical benefit in 19/20 (95%) patients (platelet count ≥ 100 × 109/L), 15/20 (75%) patients able to resume chemotherapy without recurrence, 14/20 (70%) patients completed more than 2 subse- quent cycles of chemotherapy 3/20 developed DVT

 

Chawla et al. [19] 2013 Eltrombopag

 

Phase I dose escalation study

 

12 with CIT in advanced soft tissue sarcoma

 

Treatment for CIT (<75× 109/L with previous chemotherapy)

 

doxorubicin and ifosfamide

Clinical benefit in 11/12 (91%)
– completed at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy
Closed early due to slow recruit- ment

 

Hayes, et al. [26 ] 2013

Pooled Pharma- cokinetic/ pharmaco- dynamic data

 

Combined 3 different studies (Kellum [20], Jenkins, Mat- thys 2010)

 

Prophylactic (Studies 1 and 2 were in healthy subjects, study 3-Kellum et al.)

 

Carboplatin/ paclitaxel

 

Eltrombopag stimulated platelet precursor production, propor- tional to plasma Eltrombopag concentration

 

Winer, E. S. et al.
[11] 2012 Eltrom- bopag

 

Phase 1 placebo controlled

 

26 with solid tumours

Prophylactic/Treatment (baseline count <300× 109/L, planned for 6 cycles of chemo)

Gemcitabine with or without Cisplatin or Carboplatin

Well-tolerated and improved platelet count compared to placebo especially in combination arm (platelet nadir 53 compared to 113)

Author/year pub- lished/ Drug

Type of study

Patient (N)

Indication for use

Chemotherapy

Result

 

Kellum et al. [20] 2010 Eltrombopag

 

Rand- omized phase 2 study
compared to Placebo

 

183 with advanced solid tumours

 

Prophylactic (chemo Naïve, planned for at least 2 cycles of carboplatin at 5-6 AUC)

 

First line Carbo- platin/paclitaxel

Post-chemo nadir platelet counts increased during cycles 1 and
2 in all Eltrombopag treatment groups compared with placebo but did not achieve the primary end point of change in platelet count from Day 1 of Cycle 2 to nadir in Cycle 2.

 

Vadhan-Raj S etal [27]
2010
AMG 531

Rand- omized, placebo- controlled, dose and schedule- finding phase I/II study

 

 

50 patients with non-Hodg- kin’s lymphoma

 

 

Prophylactic (patients planned for specific chemo regimen)

 

RHyper-CVAD alternating with RArac-MTX

The platelet nadir was significantly higher and the duration of throm- bocytopenia was shorter, with
a reduced need for the platelet transfusions in 4 pts;
AE-2 deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and 2 pulmonary embolism (PE)

 

Fanale M et al. (2009)

open-label dose- and schedule- finding study

 

39 patients with lymphoma

 

Treatment of CIT (Platelet count <50× 109/L)

 

Multiple regi- mens

No dose-dependent effect on the incidence of serious AEs. One patient with stage IV gastric lym- phoma died following a serious AE of gastrointestinal hemorrhage

 

Natale, R et al. [13] 2009
Romiplostim

 

Ran- domised placebo controlled Phase 2

 

62 patients with NSCLC (placebo:Romiplostim-12:50)

 

Treatment of CIT in previous cycle ( platelet <100× 109/L)

 

Gemcitabine and platinum- based

No evidence of beneficial impact on platelet count related efficacy endpoints.
Serious AE – 1/12 (placebo) cf.
17/50 (Romiplostim)
3 thrombotic events in Romi- plostim group,

Table 1: Literature search for the use of thrombopoietin agonists in the setting of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia

CURRENT TRIALS

 

NCT03937154

Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Study of Romiplostim for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Ovarian Cancer, or Breast Cancer- estimated completion date: 26 February, 2023
NCT03362177

RECITE: A Phase 3 Randomized Placebocontrolled Double-blind Study of Romiplostim for the Treatment of Chemotherapy- induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Receiving FOLFOX-based Chemotherapy for Treatment of Gastrointestinal or Colorectal Cancer - estimated completion date: 18 December, 2022

Date

WCC

Neutrophil

Platelet

Hb

Remark

4 January 2019

5.7

3.2

253

127

 

7 January 2019

Commenced Concurrent ChemoRadiotherapy

14 January 2019

5.6

3.5

275

130

Developed grade 1 diarrhoea

29 January 2019

5.5

3.3

199

120

 

1 February 2019

6.4

5.8

117

121

 

2 February 2019

 

 

 

 

Stopped dexamethasone due to severe esophagitis

4 February 2019

4.4

3.5

53

121

Temozolomide stopped, asymptomatic

06 February 2019

2.5

1.8

22

118

 

07 February 2019

2.6

2.1

13

120

Admission and First Platelet Transfusion

11 February 2019

1.2

0.8

5

108

Tx- when Platelet <10 (almost Second daily platelet transfu- sion)

13 February 2019

0.9

0.4

14

104

Developed bruising, rashes but no bleeding

Date

WCC

Neutrophil

Platelet

Hb

Remark

15 February 2019

0.8

0.1

4

102

Started Prednisone 1 mg/kg/day , daily platelet transfusion, GCSF, with plan to arrange HLA matched platelets,

18 February 2019

0.6

0.1

3

89

 

19 February 2019

0.8

0.1

4

81

No change in Platelet/ Neutrophil count despite stopping temozolomide for 2 weeks

20 February 2019

0.5

0.2

5

76

Received last dose of RT ( 29/30 #) prior to transfer to tertiary centre for ongoing haematology input

23 February 2019

1.0

0.3

2

87

Platelet Transfusion

27 February 2019

1.9

0.7

4

82

 

02 March 2019

2.2

0.9

4

89

 

07 March 2019

2.0

0.8

9

80

Post Bone marrow aspiration

15 March 2019

8.3

6.4

9

82

Platelet Transfusion

21 March 2019

3.1

1.7

13

90

Platelet Transfusion

27 March 2019

7.1

5.0

15

92

 

03 April 2019

5.9

4.2

21

88

 

11 April 2019

Application for Eltrombopag

14 April 2019

2.7

1.5

39

93

 

Post platelet Tx

3

1.8

78

88

First significant increase in count post HLA matched Platelet Tx

16 May 2019

7

5.3

30

88

Platelet Tx

 

6

4.4

76

88

Post Platelet Tx

21 May 2019

Commenced on Eltrombopag 50 mg daily, Platelet transfusion decreased to weekly, Continued GCSF twice weekly

23 May 2019

8.5

6.4

54

107

 

28 May 2019

3.3

1.9

74

109

 

04 June 2019

3.

2.4

66

116

 

11 June 2019

3.8

2.3

73

114

 

17 June 2019

5

3

87

123

 

24 June 2019

5.6

3.9

100

120

 

08 July 2019

5.1

3.5

108

128

 

15 July 2019

6.1

4.4

121

126

 

22 July 2019

GCSF reduced to weekly dose

1 August 2019

10

3.6

125

129

 

27 August 2019

5.6

3.9

151

122

 

19 September 2019

3.8

2.2

171

127

 

Table 2: WCC (109/L), neutrophil (109/L), platelet (109/L) and Hb (g/L) levels from 04 January to 19 September 2019